Custom Search
Who's Online
12 registered (canary22, Anastasia517, Ktrencha, CandiMc, 5 invisible), 71 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest posts
Platinum vs Palladium
by Ktrencha
$38 diamond sim engagement ring (pic heavy!)
by Queen of Sparkle
01:36 PM
Baked new HSN CZ
by Queen of Sparkle
01:22 PM
How much bling is too much bling?
by jcent
12:48 PM
shipping?
by huesohui
10:04 AM
Forum Stats
9236 Members
52 Forums
45843 Topics
761809 Posts

Max Online: 279 @ 06/26/12 12:39 PM
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Newest Members
sparkle sleuth, Loops, Holybasil, Amanda Appleby, MissSparkle
9236 Registered Users
(Views)Popular Topics
First word that comes to your mind... 21558143
celebrity engagement rings! 3878694
Has anyone done HCG for weigh loss 2045472
Favorites perfumes? 1425111
Check this seller out... 1366083
Post your e-rings 1239235
Meet Mira(tm)...a sneak, brief intro 1084880
The Amora Blog...the Amora Gem Chapter 1075109
Anyone want to be weight loss buddies? 1024613
what's for supper tonight? 827957
Latest photos...
and a few hand shots ;)
Peach Gold and my OEC
Show your Vintage...
New milgrained bezels!
A full shot of my new earrings.
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#735505 - 04/25/12 09:46 AM Does this seem outrageous?!
Tigger4066 Offline
Afficionado

Registered: 11/13/11
Posts: 505
Loc: Indy
I have a 14k ring that I'd like to have made larger. It's currently a 5 1/2 and I need it to be an 8. There's nothing really unusual about the ring. It doesn't have stones on the shank or anything. The jeweler wanted to insert a half of a shank on the back to up the size. They wanted 150.00 to do this! I know gold is high right now but that seems excessive for such a small amount.

Top
#735509 - 04/25/12 09:52 AM Re: Does this seem outrageous?! [Re: Tigger4066]
elf925 Offline
Omniscient

Registered: 06/06/08
Posts: 3055
Loc: Orange County, CA
Sadly no, its on par with quotes I've received in some cases less than I've been quoted.

Top
#735510 - 04/25/12 09:52 AM Re: Does this seem outrageous?! [Re: Tigger4066]
e.taylor Offline
The Black Orlov

Registered: 03/15/09
Posts: 4190
that seems high, but in line with what I'm hearing.

Top
#735513 - 04/25/12 09:59 AM Re: Does this seem outrageous?! [Re: Tigger4066]
KaterBels Offline
Ashaholic

Registered: 06/28/11
Posts: 226
Loc: New York (Upsate, we have tree...
The last jeweler I went to for sizing (granted, this was about 5 years ago) charged about $30/size. I'd say with the rising cost of gold, that seems normal. I'd get a second opinion from a reputable jeweler first though, just in case.
_________________________
Some days are diamonds, some days are rocks.

Top
#735514 - 04/25/12 10:04 AM Re: Does this seem outrageous?! [Re: KaterBels]
e.taylor Offline
The Black Orlov

Registered: 03/15/09
Posts: 4190
yeah, I should have included that I had a ring sized recently-like in the last few months. 14k and it went from 5.5 to 6.75 (left to right!) and it was over $100.

Top
#735547 - 04/25/12 11:10 AM Re: Does this seem outrageous?! [Re: Tigger4066]
Mamato3blessings Offline
Afficionado

Registered: 03/14/12
Posts: 576
Send it to DK. He was going to size a WG ring for me up 3.5 sizes for $50. He also sized an intricate platinum ring for me for $125.

Top
#735566 - 04/25/12 11:42 AM Re: Does this seem outrageous?! [Re: Tigger4066]
Bryan Cavitt Offline
Fiend

Registered: 02/17/12
Posts: 100
Loc: Elkhart, Indiana
That's quite a deal on the half-shank if the ring really needed that. The problem in sizing a ring larger is that even though there are no stones on the shank, the jeweler is still responsible for any stone loss, so that protection is built into the price.

I'm still amazed by the prices I see quoted here for repairs! Must have far less overhead than we do or they don't try to make much money I guess. I suppose that's a topic onto itself.

Bryan Cavitt
_________________________
Bryan Cavitt
Images Jewelers

Top
#735580 - 04/25/12 12:04 PM Re: Does this seem outrageous?! [Re: Bryan Cavitt]
elf925 Offline
Omniscient

Registered: 06/06/08
Posts: 3055
Loc: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted By: Bryan Cavitt
That's quite a deal on the half-shank if the ring really needed that. The problem in sizing a ring larger is that even though there are no stones on the shank, the jeweler is still responsible for any stone loss, so that protection is built into the price.

I'm still amazed by the prices I see quoted here for repairs! Must have far less overhead than we do or they don't try to make much money I guess. I suppose that's a topic onto itself.

Bryan Cavitt


Wow every jeweler I've ever come across does not in any way assume responsibility for stone loss. They just say if it happened it will be whatever extra they want to charge on top of the crazy high sizing fees. It costs around a hundred bucks to size a yellow gold solitaire from a 6.5 to an 8 round these parts!

Top
#735585 - 04/25/12 12:26 PM Re: Does this seem outrageous?! [Re: elf925]
Mamato3blessings Offline
Afficionado

Registered: 03/14/12
Posts: 576
Quote:
I'm still amazed by the prices I see quoted here for repairs! Must have far less overhead than we do or they don't try to make much money I guess. I suppose that's a topic onto itself.


David assumes responsibility for stone loss, does amazing work, is honest, has a retail establishment that has been in business 30 years and has amazing customer service. I don't know how he does it, but he's flooded with customers, so he must do something right smile.

No, I'm not a fan at all laugh.

Top
#735589 - 04/25/12 12:57 PM Re: Does this seem outrageous?! [Re: Tigger4066]
MissKK Offline
Omniscient

Registered: 09/29/10
Posts: 2990
Loc: Snohomish, Washington
seems high to me. I got mine sized from a 6 to 8.25 for $45.
_________________________
I'm not always right, but I'm never wrong!

Top
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 >



Moderator:  Dana ♥, gemcat, tricksi